Criteria before conclusions
Evaluation criteria and weighting are documented before products are selected or conclusions are written.
Research and evaluation
Compare AI application platforms with the criteria visible.
Pageka publishes evidence-based comparisons of deployment, security, ownership, and governance approaches for AI-built internal applications.
Evidence you can inspect
Claims point to primary sources, reproducible tests, and the date each source was accessed or each result measured.
Corrections stay visible
Material changes are recorded, opinions are separated from measured facts, and readers can challenge the methodology.
Latest guidance
Recently published
customer-cloud
Compare Retool with Generated Code in a Company Cloud
Compare a managed internal-app platform and generated code with one fixture and evidence for ownership, recovery, and exit.
governed-platforms
Customer-Cloud Security Changes Control, Not Outcomes
Compare the security control and evidence boundaries of managed vendor cloud and customer-cloud deployment without assuming either is safer.
governed-platforms
Evaluate Audit-Log Export in an Internal-App Platform
Use one fixed event, filter, export, retention, and access request to evaluate audit-log export without mistaking documentation for observed evidence.
Publishing next
The first reporting tracks
- A governed AI-application platform framework
- Customer-cloud versus vendor-cloud deployment
- A security and governance evaluation checklist
- A reproducible platform comparison
About this publication
Transparent about method and evidence.
Pageka applies the same documented criteria to every product. It does not present opinion as measurement and records limitations directly.